Skip to main content

Where could distributed ledger technology be a good fit for government?

Posted by: and , Posted on: - Categories: Uncategorized

A flow chart with the aim of helping policy-makers decide whether their problem is best solved by using distributed ledger technology, or by other alternatives.

In an earlier blog post we explained how distributed ledger technology (DLT) can provide transparency and accountability. In this post we’re going to take a closer look at how to decide whether DLT might be a good fit for a policy problem.

Governance in a distributed ledger

The governance of distributed ledgers is normally decentralised. For example, every transaction made with the cryptocurrency Bitcoin can be seen in a publicly distributed ledger. Anybody can access this ledger, add a transaction to it, and check if a transaction is legitimate.

A first question for using DLT is whether governance should be decentralised. This may not always be suitable for public services. There are circumstances where public services may need central governance to:

  1. verify that data entered into the ledger is valid, and
  2. limit access to the ledger to trusted parties.

These aspects of central governance can be applied to DLT as long as the central party is trusted. For example, if academic qualifications were to be stored on a distributed ledger, then a trusted party such as a government department could ensure that only accredited institutions are allowed to add to the ledger.

However, if the central party were the only party permitted to add to the ledger, then it may be worth considering the use of a central database instead.

Difficulties with new technologies

Like all new technologies, DLT may be difficult to introduce. There are three main concerns:

  1. Data held in a DLT cannot be retroactively changed. Information held in distributed ledgers are distributed amongst many people, making it difficult to remove or change existing information.
  2. DLT may not mesh with existing processes. For example, a possible use of DLT is to verifying digital evidence collected by the police. However, this must fit with processes and standards for collecting and storing digital data.
  3. DLT is a new technology which may not yet be sufficiently proven for some use cases. Alternative technologies may have stood the test of time or have had significant research and development.

Deciding when to use DLT

To help investigate where to use DLT, we used the below flowchart

DLT definitely has potential to transform public services. However, it is important that decisions to use DLT are carefully considered.

Sharing and comments

Share this page